Plurk As A Micro-Blogging Platform
Veteran Plurker @dotlizard has very astutely suggested an addition to my proposed list of sobriquets which could rightfully be applied to Plurk. I have added her suggestion to the original column and will use her words to tell why Plurk also belongs to the category Micro-Blogging. One forgets (at least I did) how quickly Web genres appear and become at least semi-official, and thus did I leave this important category out of the list.
In a comment in the original column, dotlizard started by saying, “I would propose a fourth category, micro-blogging. I believe that micro-blogging does incorporate all of the above listed functions [in the original column] but in a very lightweight fashion, which i consider typical of the micro-blogging platform (Twitter, Pownce, Jaiku, Brightkite).”
Dotlizard goes on to say, “To me, micro-blogging is like the playground of the social media / networking / bookmarking crowd, a place where they can interact without necessarily being compelled to always produce or link to *great* content. it is also an acceptable venue to promote their non-micro blogs (whereas that is frowned upon in social media and bookmarking). The “micro” format encourages discussion but puts up barriers to discussions of any depth (so it’s perfect for the modern, internet-addled attention span). also, it’s a more relaxed environment, where it’s ok to be outright goofy, as opposed to the other types of sites where contributions are submitted for judgment by others.”
These comments are obviously right on the money. Even more so is dotlizard’s commentary on Plurks contribution to the Micro-Blogging medium. She says, “I actually believe that Plurk has taken the micro-blog platform to the next level. while Pownce, Jaiku, and BK all have great advantages over the original Twitter in their multimedia sharing capabilities, none were able to beat the immediacy of Twitter (as experienced through Twitter clients such as Twhirl, anyway). What Plurk has done is included the immediacy in a shiny, on-the-fly-updating AJAX web interface, and added the elusive Karma to hook the competitive types.”
I believe that dotlizard has more to share with us on this subject, and I hope she chooses to let us showcase her views here. It is most apparent that she is a keen observer of the virtual social scene.
I am KDFrawg on Plurk, and I hope you will stop by there and let me know what you think!





June 22nd, 2008 at 12:19 pm
[...] (This last was added at the suggestion of @dotlizard. See here for more) [...]
June 23rd, 2008 at 10:03 am
I have to say that I’m not really as impressed with Plurk as everyone else buzzes about it. Perhaps part of it is that it lacks a good client app (I don’t feel like having a screen dedicated to a micro-blogging app) and it also lacks integration into all the other social platforms.
I’ll be patient and see where Plurk takes us - but integration and a client app are biggies on my list.
June 23rd, 2008 at 10:21 am
@Douglas Karr -
Thanks a million for stopping by and taking the time to comment! In terms of client apps, there are probably a dozen in progress, so you will not have long to wait there. I don’t really care about a client app. One of the things that I like about Plurk is the GUI. If you take the GUI away, it’s not a lot different than Twitter.
Integration with other social apps will also come, but again these will lack the GUI and the other pleasures of Plurk, so I don’t really care about them either. I want to have conversations; the linear mode into which you will be forced without the app is just not conversational.
Twitter is for announcements. Plurk is for conversation.
– Michael W. Jones, 2008
And conversations take a little focus, especially when there are a lot of them going on at once. When I Plurk, I don’t do much else, generally. With about 200 “sentences” vying for my attention every hour, I can’t. So I come to Plurk fully expecting to pay attention to it. Trying to do that in a linear mode, without the timeline and threads, is like walking down the street shouting your announcements and losing your ability to respond to more that one thing at a time.
More in the next column, which you have just given me the ammunition to write.
Plurk is not for everyone, certainly But, boy, it’s for me.
KDFrawg (the Plurkiverse dewd)
June 24th, 2008 at 1:27 am
i agree 100% about the UI. it is what sets Plurk apart from the rest, the presence of multiple conversations all laid out in timeline form. now, when they give us more detailed options on how to control the timeline, it’ll be even better. right now, i’d like to be able to clear everything, and i mean everything, as read when i come to plurk after a number of hours away. it takes forever right now to get where i’ve marked all as read and feel current. and, i would like to select between automatic following/choosing to mute, and automatic muting/choosing to follow. i might use either option, but i think most often i would choose to automatically mute and choose which plurks i follow. i think this would enhance the conversational functionality greatly.
oh and thanks for the nice compliments
June 24th, 2008 at 6:33 am
[...] liest man in der Plurkiverse: Plurk As A Micro-Blogging Platform, dennoch artet selbige spuehrbar in Arbeit aus [...]
June 28th, 2008 at 3:58 am
Great article, it sounds like the thing to do.
July 5th, 2008 at 11:25 pm
In some ways I have an issue classifying Plurk as a Micro-blogging platform. Not sure why, but most of the conversations that occur are no different than that found in any instant messaging platform. Is that to say that any IM is a Micro-Blogging system? I think it is too fluid, too dynamic, too interactive. More in line with an IM2.0 if there were such a concept.